Tests Show Raw Milk Farmer Does Not Have BrucellosisFrom Food Safety News
No Raw Milk Link, No Brucellosis in Massachusetts
A Massachusetts resident who first tested positive for brucellosis has now been confirmed to not have the infection, according to an email from the assistant commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources (MDAR).
"While initial test results did show up positive, further, more specific and accurate testing by the CDC confirmed that the person does not have brucellosis," Nathan L'Etoile wrote in the message forwarded by the NOFA/Massachusetts Raw Milk Network.
As a result, the MDAR "will be rescinding the Cease and Desist from the sale of Raw Milk" order that had been issued in the state last week, the email stated.
The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH), in an email, also confirmed that "the patient did test negative for brucellosis. The milk and the cows also tested negative for any brucellosis bacteria. Neither DPH or DAR have any health concerns at this time."
On Jan. 20, the MDAR and the DPH issued a consumer alert for raw milk from Twin Rivers Farm in Ashley Falls, MA "due to the possibility of raw milk being contaminated with Brucella."
That earlier news release stated, in part: "This investigation is being conducted in response to a suspected human case, following an individual's contact with this farm. The presence of Brucella in raw milk represents a significant danger to public health."
In his email Thursday, L'Etoile wrote, "All in all this has been a trying experience, but the cooperation and willingness to take the steps needed by MDAR, DPH, USDA and most importantly the farmer has helped immensely."
Read the whole story: http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2012/01/no-raw-milk-link-to-brucellosis-in-massachusetts/
Real Life Dangers of Raw Milk
Several families offered to share their stories on video to help raise awareness about the potential risks and negative effects on health from drinking contaminated raw milk.Real Life Stories